Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31421 - 31430 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 31421 - 31430 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to disregard the express statements of the circuit court on the record stating that it was not “choos[ing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218419 - 2018-09-05
to disregard the express statements of the circuit court on the record stating that it was not “choos[ing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218419 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
Kenneth W. Rupena v. Palmer Johnson of Racine, Inc.
interpretation of Rupena’s testimony such that he could be impeached with that statement at trial, he could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
interpretation of Rupena’s testimony such that he could be impeached with that statement at trial, he could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and probation, its consideration of these objectives is implicit in its statement that it was ordering jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76100 - 2012-01-10
and probation, its consideration of these objectives is implicit in its statement that it was ordering jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76100 - 2012-01-10
Glenn v. George Huxhold
Ordinarily, we would begin our discussion with a statement regarding our standard of review under summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10650 - 2005-03-31
Ordinarily, we would begin our discussion with a statement regarding our standard of review under summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rebecca A. Yager v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
and contradictions in the statements of witnesses do not render the testimony inherently or patently incredible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14396 - 2014-09-15
and contradictions in the statements of witnesses do not render the testimony inherently or patently incredible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14396 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jennifer A. Croop v. Tom A. Sweeney
her. It appears from the trial court’s statements No(s). 99-0763 6 from the bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15289 - 2017-09-21
her. It appears from the trial court’s statements No(s). 99-0763 6 from the bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15289 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Friederick. ¶16 In sum, while Friederick stopped in response to Small’s statement to him, the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108336 - 2017-09-21
Friederick. ¶16 In sum, while Friederick stopped in response to Small’s statement to him, the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108336 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stanley Montelius
not disagree with those general statements, neither case governs here. As the State points out, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5133 - 2005-03-31
not disagree with those general statements, neither case governs here. As the State points out, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5133 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not reflect a reasonable basis for the determination or a statement of the relevant facts or reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102299 - 2013-10-01
not reflect a reasonable basis for the determination or a statement of the relevant facts or reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102299 - 2013-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
disposition of the credibility dispute. We disagree. ¶9 As Holmes argues, the statements in Jackson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28152 - 2007-02-20
disposition of the credibility dispute. We disagree. ¶9 As Holmes argues, the statements in Jackson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28152 - 2007-02-20