Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31421 - 31430 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 31421 - 31430 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Victor Villalobos
with the State that the pathologist's statement that it “was possible” that Roseann fell repeatedly against one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7985 - 2005-03-31
with the State that the pathologist's statement that it “was possible” that Roseann fell repeatedly against one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7985 - 2005-03-31
City of Whitewater v. Robert P. Michor
line is illegal. While Michor’s statement is true, whether the observed conduct is lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4683 - 2005-03-31
line is illegal. While Michor’s statement is true, whether the observed conduct is lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4683 - 2005-03-31
County of Buffalo v. Bonnie L. K.
, the statements demonstrate that the court's factual findings were based on the evidence before it about her needs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14124 - 2005-03-31
, the statements demonstrate that the court's factual findings were based on the evidence before it about her needs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14124 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
Wis.2d 414, 434, 351 N.W.2d 758 (Ct. App. 1984). Deffke argues that the trial court's statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9073 - 2017-09-19
Wis.2d 414, 434, 351 N.W.2d 758 (Ct. App. 1984). Deffke argues that the trial court's statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9073 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the victim’s statement, and Lazic’s background information. Because Lazic insisted the two read-in counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240676 - 2019-05-15
, the victim’s statement, and Lazic’s background information. Because Lazic insisted the two read-in counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240676 - 2019-05-15
State v. Adam J. Nelson
” on the Informing the Accused form specifically advised Nelson that he was under arrest. This statement, provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7548 - 2005-03-31
” on the Informing the Accused form specifically advised Nelson that he was under arrest. This statement, provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7548 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously relied on the number of cases in which Van Den Heuvel had been a party to support its statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24
erroneously relied on the number of cases in which Van Den Heuvel had been a party to support its statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
, without explication, the issues of coerced and false statements, malicious prosecution, and ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30270 - 2007-09-17
, without explication, the issues of coerced and false statements, malicious prosecution, and ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30270 - 2007-09-17
CA Blank Order
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version. [2] The record contains a June 6, 2012 probable cause statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105377 - 2013-12-10
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version. [2] The record contains a June 6, 2012 probable cause statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105377 - 2013-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reflects Batcher’s statement: THE DEFENDANT: I’d just like to apologize to the [c]ourt for my
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260793 - 2020-05-19
reflects Batcher’s statement: THE DEFENDANT: I’d just like to apologize to the [c]ourt for my
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260793 - 2020-05-19