Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31421 - 31430 of 68288 for law.
Search results 31421 - 31430 of 68288 for law.
COURT OF APPEALS
There is no dispute that the stop of Eirich’s vehicle was lawful and that the odor of raw marijuana created probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130497 - 2014-11-25
There is no dispute that the stop of Eirich’s vehicle was lawful and that the odor of raw marijuana created probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130497 - 2014-11-25
State v. Stuart M. Buzzell
for a lawful detention, and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Robert Trevarthen, a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
for a lawful detention, and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Robert Trevarthen, a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wilfredo Melo
conduct was lawful if: (1) he was rightfully in Melo's presence when he frisked him; and (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
conduct was lawful if: (1) he was rightfully in Melo's presence when he frisked him; and (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
homicide as a party to a crime. Second, we conclude, under well-settled case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27527 - 2014-09-15
homicide as a party to a crime. Second, we conclude, under well-settled case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27527 - 2014-09-15
State v. Justin David Schwartz
OF REVIEW ¶9 Whether the trial court had the authority to amend the sentence is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7220 - 2005-03-31
OF REVIEW ¶9 Whether the trial court had the authority to amend the sentence is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173720 - 2017-09-21
“presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173720 - 2017-09-21
State v. Vincent J. Longo
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. (quoting State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14875 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. (quoting State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14875 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was erroneous as a matter of law because it relied on clearly erroneous findings of fact. Based upon a review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
was erroneous as a matter of law because it relied on clearly erroneous findings of fact. Based upon a review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Kachelski Kachelski Law Office 7101 N. Green Bay Ave, Suite 6A Milwaukee, WI 53209 Karen A. Loebel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248047 - 2019-10-02
Kachelski Kachelski Law Office 7101 N. Green Bay Ave, Suite 6A Milwaukee, WI 53209 Karen A. Loebel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248047 - 2019-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Alil Azizi
). We will not find an erroneous exercise of that discretion if the trial court applied the proper law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8987 - 2017-09-19
). We will not find an erroneous exercise of that discretion if the trial court applied the proper law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8987 - 2017-09-19