Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31441 - 31450 of 63951 for records/1000.

State v. Russell Stokes
, that Knighten and Clark were alibi witnesses is supported by the record, and therefore, defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31

State v. Melody L. Dallman
to dismiss this case. ¶10 Upon review of the record, this court was of the opinion that reliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18131 - 2005-05-10

State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
. Instead, she claimed not to know how the damage occurred. Thus, ample evidence in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194371 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James Durrah
of the record reveals that the postconviction decision can be found at exhibit 25 in the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2236 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403075 - 2021-08-03

[PDF] State v. James L. Gilmore
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
. Douglas’s family suggests that the WDSS records document incidents in which Brandon engaged in sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757351 - 2024-01-30

Ozaukee County Department of Social Services v. John D.
review of the record indicates that the trial court did not make any explicit credibility findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5206 - 2005-03-31