Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31461 - 31470 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 31461 - 31470 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. David W. Suchocki
report and to order a new PSI prepared by a different agent. Suchocki claimed that the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10963 - 2017-09-19
report and to order a new PSI prepared by a different agent. Suchocki claimed that the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10963 - 2017-09-19
City of Kenosha v. Timothy M. Clark
the premises. Clark further claimed that his goal was to hold the youth until the police arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9435 - 2005-03-31
the premises. Clark further claimed that his goal was to hold the youth until the police arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to a claim that the trial court erred in denying Scott’s motion to suppress. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568238 - 2022-09-20
that there is no arguable merit to a claim that the trial court erred in denying Scott’s motion to suppress. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568238 - 2022-09-20
[PDF]
Ricky L. Heath v. Avco Financial Services of Wisconsin, Inc.
that AVCO, acting as a debt collector, communicated with Heath’s employer regarding AVCO’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13472 - 2017-09-21
that AVCO, acting as a debt collector, communicated with Heath’s employer regarding AVCO’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13472 - 2017-09-21
State v. Greg A. Mayer
Schnorr’s expert testimony. Both claims of error involve an allegedly erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13403 - 2005-03-31
Schnorr’s expert testimony. Both claims of error involve an allegedly erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13403 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rodrigo Rodriguez
only Rodriguez’s claim under § 904.03. His claim that the evidence constituted “other acts” evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6893 - 2017-09-20
only Rodriguez’s claim under § 904.03. His claim that the evidence constituted “other acts” evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6893 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. John A. Jipson
claims his plea was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently and therefore is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
claims his plea was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently and therefore is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1), and an order denying his postconviction motion. Moore claims that: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34037 - 2008-09-15
Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1), and an order denying his postconviction motion. Moore claims that: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34037 - 2008-09-15
State v. Rufus Davis
postconviction claim that he was denied his due process right to a fair trial because the prosecutor commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
postconviction claim that he was denied his due process right to a fair trial because the prosecutor commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31