Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31471 - 31480 of 52769 for address.
Search results 31471 - 31480 of 52769 for address.
State v. Ryan A. Forman
that the sentence was harsh and excessive, we do not need to address that issue.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15846 - 2005-03-31
that the sentence was harsh and excessive, we do not need to address that issue.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15846 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry L. Cox
sentence. After an evidentiary hearing, the court denied the motion. The no merit report addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13642 - 2005-03-31
sentence. After an evidentiary hearing, the court denied the motion. The no merit report addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13642 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not. The court, in its decision, addressed the voluntariness of Murrell’s plea, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32812 - 2008-05-27
did not. The court, in its decision, addressed the voluntariness of Murrell’s plea, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32812 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and abettor. The no-merit report addresses whether the court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261533 - 2020-05-21
and abettor. The no-merit report addresses whether the court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261533 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
See RULE 809.21. The no-merit report addresses the following appellate issues: (1) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102773 - 2017-09-21
See RULE 809.21. The no-merit report addresses the following appellate issues: (1) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102773 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 1992) (declining to address arguments that lacked “developed themes reflecting any legal reasoning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356572 - 2021-04-15
. 1992) (declining to address arguments that lacked “developed themes reflecting any legal reasoning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356572 - 2021-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report addresses the potential issues of whether Sellen’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191275 - 2017-09-21
. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report addresses the potential issues of whether Sellen’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry N. Henkel
factor and addressed specific reasons for not modifying the sentence, the supreme court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12465 - 2017-09-21
factor and addressed specific reasons for not modifying the sentence, the supreme court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12465 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of conviction. The no merit report addresses only whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12419 - 2017-09-21
. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of conviction. The no merit report addresses only whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12419 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
months of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632086 - 2023-03-14
months of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632086 - 2023-03-14