Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31471 - 31480 of 68874 for he.
Search results 31471 - 31480 of 68874 for he.
State v. Arieyah O. Goodlow
after revocation of his extended supervision, and an order denying him post-sentencing relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25112 - 2006-06-27
after revocation of his extended supervision, and an order denying him post-sentencing relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25112 - 2006-06-27
CA Blank Order
and burglary while armed with a dangerous weapon, both as a repeat offender. He also appeals from an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02
and burglary while armed with a dangerous weapon, both as a repeat offender. He also appeals from an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02
Carl J. Sweney v. Phyllis J. Sweney
, Carl moved to reduce child support, contending that he is entitled to the rebuttable presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9819 - 2005-03-31
, Carl moved to reduce child support, contending that he is entitled to the rebuttable presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9819 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Earl Diehl appeals from a judgment convicting him of theft by contractor. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30407 - 2007-09-26
PER CURIAM. Earl Diehl appeals from a judgment convicting him of theft by contractor. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30407 - 2007-09-26
Jeffrey E. Sobczak v. Eleanor Ciganek
from a judgment awarding Jeffrey Sobczak $285,064.13 for damages (and costs) he sustained in a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3371 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment awarding Jeffrey Sobczak $285,064.13 for damages (and costs) he sustained in a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3371 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan Liebzeit
and hiding a corpse.[1] He also appeals an order denying his motion in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13888 - 2005-03-31
and hiding a corpse.[1] He also appeals an order denying his motion in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13888 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. He contends that he was no longer under the jurisdiction of the State when revoked, and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29451 - 2007-06-20
. He contends that he was no longer under the jurisdiction of the State when revoked, and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29451 - 2007-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, he argued that postconviction counsel had been ineffective “for failing to file a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32208 - 2008-03-24
motion, he argued that postconviction counsel had been ineffective “for failing to file a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32208 - 2008-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stewart argues that he is entitled to withdraw his plea. We disagree and affirm the judgment and orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56193 - 2010-11-02
. Stewart argues that he is entitled to withdraw his plea. We disagree and affirm the judgment and orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56193 - 2010-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by telephone, explaining that he resides in Florida. The court denied the request. Timothy moved again
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134109 - 2017-09-21
by telephone, explaining that he resides in Florida. The court denied the request. Timothy moved again
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134109 - 2017-09-21