Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3151 - 3160 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3151 - 3160 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Carson Darnell Combs
,” in violation of Wis. Stat. § 943.14. Combs also claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18890 - 2005-07-06
,” in violation of Wis. Stat. § 943.14. Combs also claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18890 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.’s motion to dismiss on the basis that the probable cause hearing on the petition was not held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298272 - 2020-10-22
.’s motion to dismiss on the basis that the probable cause hearing on the petition was not held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298272 - 2020-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court order terminating her guardianships of the children and awarding sole custody and primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214607 - 2018-06-21
a circuit court order terminating her guardianships of the children and awarding sole custody and primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214607 - 2018-06-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132841 - 2015-01-12
, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132841 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s order denying his motion brought pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2014AP594
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132841 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s order denying his motion brought pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2014AP594
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132841 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Flick
, Flick's probation was revoked and he was sentenced to three years imprisonment. Upon Flick's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14844 - 2017-09-21
, Flick's probation was revoked and he was sentenced to three years imprisonment. Upon Flick's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14844 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert L. Flick
and he was sentenced to three years imprisonment. Upon Flick's motion, the sentencing court amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14844 - 2005-03-31
and he was sentenced to three years imprisonment. Upon Flick's motion, the sentencing court amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14844 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
in connection with A.C.S.’s death. The charges were joined for trial. Lungren filed motions to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139735 - 2015-04-14
in connection with A.C.S.’s death. The charges were joined for trial. Lungren filed motions to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139735 - 2015-04-14
State v. Lawrence E. Green
, and by failing to explain how that sentence met the minimum custody standard. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21566 - 2006-02-27
, and by failing to explain how that sentence met the minimum custody standard. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21566 - 2006-02-27
CA Blank Order
. Pittman argued that given the various dates he was in custody, he was entitled to an additional 275 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116632 - 2014-07-08
. Pittman argued that given the various dates he was in custody, he was entitled to an additional 275 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116632 - 2014-07-08