Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3151 - 3160 of 82879 for simple case search.
Search results 3151 - 3160 of 82879 for simple case search.
CA Blank Order
the marijuana discovered during a warrantless search of the basement of his apartment building. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
the marijuana discovered during a warrantless search of the basement of his apartment building. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In this case, the circuit court examined the four corners of the search warrant affidavit in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192300 - 2017-09-21
In this case, the circuit court examined the four corners of the search warrant affidavit in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192300 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas J. Miller
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Miller’s argument. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Miller’s argument. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
State v. Penny L. Swanson
. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, she challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8845 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, she challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8845 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Penny L. Swanson
challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search warrant and suppress evidence gathered as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search warrant and suppress evidence gathered as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Response Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Lisa Hunter et al.)
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases AFL–CIO v. Elections Bd., 543 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. Wis. 1982
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefhunter2.pdf - 2022-01-03
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases AFL–CIO v. Elections Bd., 543 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. Wis. 1982
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefhunter2.pdf - 2022-01-03
Frontsheet
may be seized." Id. (citation omitted). ¶42 The DeSmidt case dealt with "whether the search of Dr
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33001 - 2008-06-09
may be seized." Id. (citation omitted). ¶42 The DeSmidt case dealt with "whether the search of Dr
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33001 - 2008-06-09
[PDF]
WI 59
). ¶35 LaCount argues that the search and seizure in the present case violated the prohibition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15
). ¶35 LaCount argues that the search and seizure in the present case violated the prohibition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude this case is controlled by State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶¶20-22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15
of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude this case is controlled by State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶¶20-22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] However, these cases do not address the issue of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22
.[2] However, these cases do not address the issue of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22