Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31501 - 31510 of 82353 for simple case.
Search results 31501 - 31510 of 82353 for simple case.
State v. Jeffrey A. Pluemer
at a recent preliminary hearing in a different criminal case against Pluemer. From that witness’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2193 - 2005-03-31
at a recent preliminary hearing in a different criminal case against Pluemer. From that witness’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2193 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
parental responsibility as to Ann and Michael. The cases were tried together and a jury determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041524 - 2025-11-25
parental responsibility as to Ann and Michael. The cases were tried together and a jury determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041524 - 2025-11-25
Village of Germantown v. Frederick A. Wittenberger
this determination based on the comparison of the facts in Wittenberger’s case to those in Quelle. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7599 - 2005-03-31
this determination based on the comparison of the facts in Wittenberger’s case to those in Quelle. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alice H. Kocinski v. Stephen E. Kravit
, but Kocinski refused to consent to the settlement agreement and her counsel withdrew from the case. Kocinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7767 - 2017-09-19
, but Kocinski refused to consent to the settlement agreement and her counsel withdrew from the case. Kocinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7767 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP1096-CR 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105185 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2012AP1096-CR 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105185 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP539 2 the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789483 - 2024-04-18
. No. 2023AP539 2 the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789483 - 2024-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for his no-contest pleas to misdemeanor theft in this case and possession of drug paraphernalia
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216040 - 2018-07-24
for his no-contest pleas to misdemeanor theft in this case and possession of drug paraphernalia
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216040 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 We note an earlier case against Hussey, Brown County case No. 2013CF196, was dismissed without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133308 - 2017-09-21
1 We note an earlier case against Hussey, Brown County case No. 2013CF196, was dismissed without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133308 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prevailing in this public records case. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654106 - 2023-05-11
prevailing in this public records case. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654106 - 2023-05-11