Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31511 - 31520 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31511 - 31520 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Sharon Kister
an improper definition of “in concert;” and (3) the trial court refused to dismiss the contempt motion based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8564 - 2005-03-31
an improper definition of “in concert;” and (3) the trial court refused to dismiss the contempt motion based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: Your recent filing for a motion for a de novo hearing on your temporary restraining order has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344044 - 2021-03-10
: Your recent filing for a motion for a de novo hearing on your temporary restraining order has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344044 - 2021-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order affirming a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that denied two motions to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82617 - 2014-09-15
an order affirming a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that denied two motions to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dane County v. Lee R.
erred in considering Lee R.’s motion to dismiss after she called Dr. Von Riotte for testimony; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13822 - 2014-09-15
erred in considering Lee R.’s motion to dismiss after she called Dr. Von Riotte for testimony; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13822 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Karl McNeil v. Brandon Hansen
a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the case based on the exclusive remedy provision
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24810 - 2017-09-21
a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the case based on the exclusive remedy provision
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24810 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
it denied his motion to suppress because the court erroneously excluded evidence that would have shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30864 - 2007-11-13
it denied his motion to suppress because the court erroneously excluded evidence that would have shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30864 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court held a motion hearing and denied Vang’s motion, determining that Vang had not established
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122272 - 2014-09-19
. The circuit court held a motion hearing and denied Vang’s motion, determining that Vang had not established
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122272 - 2014-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Mark Schultz appeals from a judgment denying his motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144920 - 2015-07-28
PER CURIAM. Mark Schultz appeals from a judgment denying his motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144920 - 2015-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
court wrongly denied a motion to suppress the fruits of a premises search triggered by materials found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
court wrongly denied a motion to suppress the fruits of a premises search triggered by materials found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and run, involving a death. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661935 - 2023-05-31
and run, involving a death. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661935 - 2023-05-31