Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31511 - 31520 of 64166 for records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the reconfinement order, or cite any part of the record to establish the discharge. Id. at 1-2. In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98444 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Zander Solutions, LLC v. Jeff Koenigs
the facts of record under the proper legal standard. See Nelson v. Taff, 175 Wis. 2d 178, 187, 189, 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7390 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
if the record shows it to be clearly erroneous, after accepting all credibility determinations made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143654 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172264 - 2017-09-21

Vances H. Smith v. Gary R. McCaughtry
of certiorari. The circuit court ordered major conduct report #617788-965 expunged from Smith’s record because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10239 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s history of undesirable behavior pattern, 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
it. No. 2022AP535-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667652 - 2023-06-13

COURT OF APPEALS
independently conclude that the facts of record applied to the proper legal standards support the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21

Joseph E. Sabol v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, “agricultural use” does not include personal gardens and hobby farms. Based on the record before us, we cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7070 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas C. Nelson
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10288 - 2017-09-20