Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31511 - 31520 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 31511 - 31520 of 64042 for records/1000.
Cynthia A. Schultz v. Charles J. Sykes
to Animal Lobby, warranting dismissal of all of Animal Lobby’s claims. The parties agreed on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6296 - 2005-03-31
to Animal Lobby, warranting dismissal of all of Animal Lobby’s claims. The parties agreed on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6296 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion “if the record shows that the circuit court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31307 - 2007-12-26
discretion “if the record shows that the circuit court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31307 - 2007-12-26
[PDF]
State v. James L. Gilmore
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
identification should have been suppressed. We further conclude that the record is insufficient to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41629 - 2014-09-15
identification should have been suppressed. We further conclude that the record is insufficient to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41629 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Village of Oregon v. Bradley W. Ancelet
. § 800.14(5). The circuit court concluded that there was no evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5542 - 2017-09-19
. § 800.14(5). The circuit court concluded that there was no evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5542 - 2017-09-19
State v. James L. Gilmore
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12538 - 2005-03-31
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12538 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did not order a [presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did not order a [presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
John O. Shaline v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
of Shaline and Yunker’s brief on the ground of inadequate record and legal citation. Record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3728 - 2005-03-31
of Shaline and Yunker’s brief on the ground of inadequate record and legal citation. Record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3728 - 2005-03-31
Lori Kaiser v. Village of Hartland
easement for all lands lying below the 100 year floodplain must be recorded at the time of recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14473 - 2005-03-31
easement for all lands lying below the 100 year floodplain must be recorded at the time of recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14473 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the correct legal principles and the facts of record. See Nos. 2021AP1284 2021AP1285 2021AP1286
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548743 - 2022-07-28
on the correct legal principles and the facts of record. See Nos. 2021AP1284 2021AP1285 2021AP1286
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548743 - 2022-07-28