Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31531 - 31540 of 57351 for id.
Search results 31531 - 31540 of 57351 for id.
State v. Cornell D. Reynolds
review the motion’s sufficiency independently. Id. at 310. If the circuit court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19677 - 2005-10-27
review the motion’s sufficiency independently. Id. at 310. If the circuit court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19677 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
conclude that the defendant has failed to prove one prong, we need not address the other prong. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20
conclude that the defendant has failed to prove one prong, we need not address the other prong. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Carl H. Zahn
. Id. In reviewing a trial court's denial of a suppression motion, we will not disturb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9093 - 2017-09-19
. Id. In reviewing a trial court's denial of a suppression motion, we will not disturb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9093 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul Sappington
constitutes ineffective assistance is a mixed question of fact and law. See id. at ¶51. We will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16200 - 2017-09-21
constitutes ineffective assistance is a mixed question of fact and law. See id. at ¶51. We will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16200 - 2017-09-21
State v. Justin F.
as to the weight it affords each of the criteria in deciding whether to waive jurisdiction. See id. In exercising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12443 - 2005-03-31
as to the weight it affords each of the criteria in deciding whether to waive jurisdiction. See id. In exercising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12443 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
on reconsideration. Id. at 666. Additionally, the Silverton court vacated its original judgment in order to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47472 - 2014-09-15
on reconsideration. Id. at 666. Additionally, the Silverton court vacated its original judgment in order to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47472 - 2014-09-15
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
requirements under the PLRA. Id. at ¶¶7-16. Reaching that conclusion, we analyzed both statutory and case-law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16193 - 2005-03-31
requirements under the PLRA. Id. at ¶¶7-16. Reaching that conclusion, we analyzed both statutory and case-law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16193 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2024AP002356 - 2025-10-23 Court Order
prejudice.” See id. ¶25. Nevertheless, we found that presumption rebutted when, for example, a judge
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=1029614 - 2025-10-23
prejudice.” See id. ¶25. Nevertheless, we found that presumption rebutted when, for example, a judge
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=1029614 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See id. at 110. ¶9 Here, the circuit court required Derzay to produce a bill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350024 - 2021-03-30
that we review de novo. See id. at 110. ¶9 Here, the circuit court required Derzay to produce a bill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350024 - 2021-03-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the government to demonstrate the constitutionality of the regulation beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. While
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390576 - 2021-07-14
to the government to demonstrate the constitutionality of the regulation beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. While
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390576 - 2021-07-14