Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31541 - 31550 of 83512 for case code.

[PDF] NOTICE
referenced in these two cases is the same; we therefore use the case names interchangeably by referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32546 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626060 - 2023-02-23

Certification
of the importance of various religious tasks. We certify this case because we conclude that the existing test
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30638 - 2007-10-17

[PDF] State v. Lane P. Caskey
) inadequately investigated the case; (8) failed to request a speedy trial; and (9) persuaded Caskey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7285 - 2017-09-20

Mary C. Volker v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
of Pentinmaki's "case" involved challenges to the credibility of the trial witnesses. The court, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8372 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, the prosecutor in this case could have refused to engage in plea bargaining. ¶8 What remains is Thompson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57070 - 2014-09-15

State v. Ronald Salmons
on a male, I don't see how that makes it more likely, in this case, that she is lying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12897 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for] a case in which, again, there’s testimony from the father he did not know that he was the father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239778 - 2019-05-01

Westel - Milwaukee Company, Inc. v. Walworth County
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9453 - 2005-03-31

State v. James E. Asbury
there is any question that he knew he could testify.” However, at the close of the State’s case, Asbury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21696 - 2006-03-14