Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31541 - 31550 of 98344 for court records search online.
Search results 31541 - 31550 of 98344 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Ricardo Martinez
. 1993), seeking C.M.’s psychiatric records. The trial court found that there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7401 - 2017-09-20
. 1993), seeking C.M.’s psychiatric records. The trial court found that there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7401 - 2017-09-20
State v. Ricardo Martinez
719 (Ct. App. 1993), seeking C.M.’s psychiatric records. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7401 - 2005-03-31
719 (Ct. App. 1993), seeking C.M.’s psychiatric records. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7401 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court record index lists the affiant’s name as “Susan Leder.” No. 2012AP756-FT 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86552 - 2014-09-15
, the circuit court record index lists the affiant’s name as “Susan Leder.” No. 2012AP756-FT 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86552 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brown County v. Grey C.B.
to previous commitments is not a part of the treatment record under § 51.20(1)(am). This court disagrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14248 - 2014-09-15
to previous commitments is not a part of the treatment record under § 51.20(1)(am). This court disagrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14248 - 2014-09-15
Brown County v. Grey C.B.
statutory provisions, this court will utilize the definition of “treatment record” in § 51.30 in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14248 - 2005-03-31
statutory provisions, this court will utilize the definition of “treatment record” in § 51.30 in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14248 - 2005-03-31
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. William D. Ridgely
there is no evidence in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion, and therefore we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14241 - 2005-03-31
there is no evidence in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion, and therefore we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14241 - 2005-03-31
Daniel J. Cowick v. David H. Schwarz
on certiorari is independent of the circuit court’s decision and we look directly to the record created
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20022 - 2005-10-25
on certiorari is independent of the circuit court’s decision and we look directly to the record created
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20022 - 2005-10-25
[PDF]
Daniel J. Cowick v. David H. Schwarz
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2005 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20022 - 2017-09-21
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2005 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Steve Watters
, and the release of the records was not prompted by the mandamus action. The trial court granted respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11636 - 2017-09-19
, and the release of the records was not prompted by the mandamus action. The trial court granted respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11636 - 2017-09-19
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Steve Watters
of the records was not prompted by the mandamus action. The trial court granted respondents’ motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11636 - 2005-03-31
of the records was not prompted by the mandamus action. The trial court granted respondents’ motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11636 - 2005-03-31