Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31551 - 31560 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
merit as to whether counsel was ineffective in regard to Spates’s current claim of PTSD. See id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061667 - 2026-01-14

Donna Sue Spielman v. Jeffrey Allen Spielman
of circumstances under § 767.32. Id. at 774-75. We also concluded that “a state family court may modify a payor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3030 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] La Porscha Hamilton v. Lawrence Olson
to comport with the new conditions. Id. at 543-44. ¶6 From our review of the record, we can find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14533 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Everts
sentence. See id. ¶9 Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor presents a legal issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21

Jalaina M.F. v. Blake W.A.
, with the child, and not solely on the fact that the child had been placed with another person. Id. at 705, 530
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13350 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence, we must adopt the inference that supports the verdict.” Id. ¶3 A defendant is guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141238 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Wideman
No. 95-0852-CR -5- repeater penalties in general.” Id. The court also held that a trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8828 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
independently the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts. See id., ¶20. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75193 - 2011-12-18

COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether the complaint states a claim and whether the answer joins an issue of fact or law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131889 - 2014-12-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in a legal proceeding that is clearly inconsistent with an earlier position. Id. “For judicial estoppel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107953 - 2017-09-21