Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31561 - 31570 of 59731 for quit claim deed/1000.

FH Healthcare Development, Inc. v. City of Wauwatosa
of Personal Property” to the City, claiming a continuing tax-exemption for United/Dynacare’s laboratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7029 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed Margaret’s tort claims against the County, concluding they “are not properly brought within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40865 - 2009-09-14

[PDF] State v. Justin D. Gudgeon
Justin D. Gudgeon’s probation extended before the extension hearing even took place. Gudgeon claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25462 - 2017-09-21

WI App 103 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2827 Complete Title o...
analyzing a summary judgment motion in a lawsuit involving multiple claims, a court must separately assess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120635 - 2014-10-28

[PDF] WI 41
restitution to or settled all claims of persons injured or harmed by petitioner's misconduct, including
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81741 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
determination, but a legal one based on underlying facts.”). ¶18 Banks also claims the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=911594 - 2025-02-12

Ingo Stange v. Jane Stange
. The court found that Ingo “makes no claim to Jane’s inheritance or to the items that were purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2493 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 103
involving multiple claims, a court must separately assess whether there are disputed issues of material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120635 - 2014-11-11

Kara B. v. Dane County
the plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims; (2) whether the scope of the constitutional duty to provide a foster
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16910 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mabel A.O. v. Conservatorship of Mabel A.O.
; that Martha claimed the house belonged to the children, not Mabel, and that Martha refused to memorialize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15169 - 2017-09-21