Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31571 - 31580 of 39868 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 31571 - 31580 of 39868 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to make a statement with respect to any matter relevant to the sentence.” ¶8 Downer expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65380 - 2014-09-15
to make a statement with respect to any matter relevant to the sentence.” ¶8 Downer expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65380 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
with a birth date of April 30, 1988. Ingli provided a written statement admitting his involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27053 - 2014-09-15
with a birth date of April 30, 1988. Ingli provided a written statement admitting his involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27053 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Fernando R. Salinas
and the court’s statement that juvenile authorities did not “zap” him “with a hard sentence.” Salinas contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20482 - 2017-09-21
and the court’s statement that juvenile authorities did not “zap” him “with a hard sentence.” Salinas contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20482 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements rather than legal precedent, the citation is not permitted under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157901 - 2017-09-21
statements rather than legal precedent, the citation is not permitted under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157901 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
not dismiss a statement from a supreme court opinion by concluding that it is dictum. Zarder v. Humana Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63275 - 2011-05-03
not dismiss a statement from a supreme court opinion by concluding that it is dictum. Zarder v. Humana Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63275 - 2011-05-03
Max Gendelman v. Armando Gollaz
characterization of Gollaz’s argument on the following statements from his brief: The garnishment was not legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11663 - 2005-03-31
characterization of Gollaz’s argument on the following statements from his brief: The garnishment was not legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Johnnie Hunter
statement that he had at least thirteen prior convictions, and nothing to suggest that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8345 - 2017-09-19
statement that he had at least thirteen prior convictions, and nothing to suggest that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8345 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had filed a pretrial motion in which she sought to suppress custodial statements made to police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262806 - 2020-06-02
had filed a pretrial motion in which she sought to suppress custodial statements made to police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262806 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the home pursuant to a court order, and agreed with the court’s statement that he wished to “stipulate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137663 - 2017-09-21
the home pursuant to a court order, and agreed with the court’s statement that he wished to “stipulate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137663 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kyle J. Nelson
takes issue with the court’s statement that Nelson had difficulty walking, when Lopes-Serrao never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21
takes issue with the court’s statement that Nelson had difficulty walking, when Lopes-Serrao never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21