Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31581 - 31590 of 61717 for does.
Search results 31581 - 31590 of 61717 for does.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assistance of counsel claim, the record does not support his contention. To succeed on an ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631222 - 2023-03-14
assistance of counsel claim, the record does not support his contention. To succeed on an ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631222 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
. While he does not dispute that the trial court is not obliged to follow any sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37585 - 2014-09-15
. While he does not dispute that the trial court is not obliged to follow any sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37585 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
concluding that evidence of progress or continuing rehabilitation while incarcerated does not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99875 - 2013-08-20
concluding that evidence of progress or continuing rehabilitation while incarcerated does not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99875 - 2013-08-20
State v. Joseph C. Clark
does not constitute mayhem unless the victim suffers permanent damage as a result.[1] His argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13365 - 2005-03-31
does not constitute mayhem unless the victim suffers permanent damage as a result.[1] His argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13365 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Stuckenberg could satisfy the ninety-day deadline. However, Stuckenberg does not represent that, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46516 - 2010-02-01
Stuckenberg could satisfy the ninety-day deadline. However, Stuckenberg does not represent that, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46516 - 2010-02-01
State v. James H. Bartz
expressly described as an alternative test.” Bartz does not attempt to demonstrate how this assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14329 - 2005-03-31
expressly described as an alternative test.” Bartz does not attempt to demonstrate how this assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14329 - 2005-03-31
Ira Lee Anderson-El II v. Ave M. Bie
.” The order does not specify, however, the grounds upon which the court granted Bie’s dismissal motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15183 - 2005-03-31
.” The order does not specify, however, the grounds upon which the court granted Bie’s dismissal motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15183 - 2005-03-31
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
of a separate appeal. [3] Dana does not contend that the trial court failed to make the findings required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4247 - 2005-03-31
of a separate appeal. [3] Dana does not contend that the trial court failed to make the findings required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4247 - 2005-03-31
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
of a separate appeal. [3] Dana does not contend that the trial court failed to make the findings required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4246 - 2005-03-31
of a separate appeal. [3] Dana does not contend that the trial court failed to make the findings required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4246 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
-moving party.” Id. “[T]his court does not resolve issues of fact on summary judgment, but rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32774 - 2014-09-15
-moving party.” Id. “[T]his court does not resolve issues of fact on summary judgment, but rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32774 - 2014-09-15