Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3161 - 3170 of 4342 for bd.

[PDF] Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
actions waived the $50,000 damage cap in the present case. Cf. Bentley v. Cleveland County Bd., 41 F.3d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8021 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
must raise it before the administrative agency.” State v. Outagamie Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131809 - 2014-12-15

[PDF] NOTICE
. No. 2005AP1507 4 preponderance of the evidence. Peterson v. Natural Res. Bd., 94 Wis. 2d 587, 598, 288
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30572 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Stephen P. Gianoli v. John Ronald Pfleiderer
. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394 (1984). The court in this case stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9836 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 108
pay no deference to its statutory interpretation and consider the issue de novo.6 Milwaukee Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65357 - 2014-09-15

John C. Stelpflug v. Town Board
Funds Bd., 207 Wis. 2d 1, 36-39, 558 N.W.2d 83 (1997). ¶31 In this case there is no statute or contract
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17315 - 2005-03-31

Kraemer Brothers, Inc. v. Dane County
. Milwaukee Bd. of Sch. Dirs., 220 Wis.2d 93, 101, 582 N.W.2d 122, 126 (1998) (applying Woznicki where school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14692 - 2005-03-31

Timothy L. Hartwich v. Michelle M. Peterson
& Farm Party v. Elections Bd., 117 Wis. 2d 351, 354, 344 N.W.2d 177 (1984). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25000 - 2006-05-01

[PDF] Tatiahanah Marie Miller v. Mauston School District
, which we review de novo. See Ball v. Dist. No. 4, Area Bd. of Vocational, Technical and Adult Educ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12689 - 2017-09-21

H. Elaine Stipetich v. William J. Grosshans
summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. See Katzman v. State Ethics Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31