Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3161 - 3170 of 68466 for did.
Search results 3161 - 3170 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
Adolph F. Cebula v. Thomas Cotter
that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in scheduling the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2635 - 2017-09-19
that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in scheduling the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2635 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Nordberg
that Nordberg had some possible broken ribs and that is why the doctors wanted to keep him there. Raiten did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10587 - 2017-09-20
that Nordberg had some possible broken ribs and that is why the doctors wanted to keep him there. Raiten did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10587 - 2017-09-20
State v. Duke M. Jawara
, the circuit court, Judge Schwartz presiding, held an indigency hearing and determined that Jawara did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5724 - 2011-02-02
, the circuit court, Judge Schwartz presiding, held an indigency hearing and determined that Jawara did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5724 - 2011-02-02
State v. Iran D. Evans
pro se. The motion alleged that Evans did not make a valid waiver of his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5465 - 2005-03-31
pro se. The motion alleged that Evans did not make a valid waiver of his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shomari L. Robinson
that he did not, that “[t]he major portion of the witnesses that I have have to do with this car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2552 - 2017-09-19
that he did not, that “[t]he major portion of the witnesses that I have have to do with this car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2552 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and did not err by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227050 - 2018-11-13
and did not err by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227050 - 2018-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interests of justice. We conclude that the delay was not unfairly prejudicial, he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36478 - 2009-05-19
in the interests of justice. We conclude that the delay was not unfairly prejudicial, he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36478 - 2009-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that she and Jones had a verbal argument, but she maintained Jones did not hit her. She stated she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29
that she and Jones had a verbal argument, but she maintained Jones did not hit her. She stated she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29
State v. Shomari L. Robinson
did not, that “[t]he major portion of the witnesses that I have have to do with this car.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2552 - 2005-03-31
did not, that “[t]he major portion of the witnesses that I have have to do with this car.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2552 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the issuance of Miranda warnings was not a response to interrogation and was not coerced, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30269 - 2007-09-17
to the issuance of Miranda warnings was not a response to interrogation and was not coerced, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30269 - 2007-09-17