Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3161 - 3170 of 50086 for our.
Search results 3161 - 3170 of 50086 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
in states with OWI statutes that differ significantly from our own. Id. (citing White, 127 Wis. 2d at 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26593 - 2006-10-03
in states with OWI statutes that differ significantly from our own. Id. (citing White, 127 Wis. 2d at 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26593 - 2006-10-03
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. See State v. Ramuta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102346 - 2014-06-09
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. See State v. Ramuta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102346 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
William McCracken v. Zorka Romanovic
suggests that we are obliged to do so. Rather, we see the matter as a matter addressed to our discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5678 - 2017-09-19
suggests that we are obliged to do so. Rather, we see the matter as a matter addressed to our discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5678 - 2017-09-19
State v. Juan Jesus S.
(1998), our focus changes with respect to the particular challenge raised. In a “lesser-included offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31
(1998), our focus changes with respect to the particular challenge raised. In a “lesser-included offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31
Glenn v. George Huxhold
in our ensuing discussion of the Rechlitzes’ appellate issues. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10650 - 2005-03-31
in our ensuing discussion of the Rechlitzes’ appellate issues. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the corrected information and completed the plea colloquy. Our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551893 - 2022-08-09
with the corrected information and completed the plea colloquy. Our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551893 - 2022-08-09
[PDF]
Max Gendelman v. Armando Gollaz
, but actually go into hiding themselves causing you to wonder what action to take. In conjunction with our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11663 - 2017-09-19
, but actually go into hiding themselves causing you to wonder what action to take. In conjunction with our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11663 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest to two counts of first-degree reckless homicide. As we explained in our decision in Thao’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901281 - 2025-01-22
no contest to two counts of first-degree reckless homicide. As we explained in our decision in Thao’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901281 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243611 - 2019-07-17
a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243611 - 2019-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635037 - 2023-03-21
right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635037 - 2023-03-21