Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31601 - 31610 of 64166 for records.
Search results 31601 - 31610 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
State v. John D. Mascaretti
that the parties had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15614 - 2017-09-21
that the parties had stipulated to the prior convictions. The record supports this assertion. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1627-CRNM 2 no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591997 - 2022-11-22
. No. 2021AP1627-CRNM 2 no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591997 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673448 - 2023-07-05
decision. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673448 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
State v. James R. Donohoo
performance of the forbidden conduct to others.”). We have reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8563 - 2005-03-31
performance of the forbidden conduct to others.”). We have reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8563 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See WIS. STAT. § 908.01(4)(b). Other documents are records affecting an interest in property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209408 - 2018-03-06
. See WIS. STAT. § 908.01(4)(b). Other documents are records affecting an interest in property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209408 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613596 - 2023-01-24
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613596 - 2023-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
These factors “include, but are not limited to: 1. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78867 - 2014-09-15
These factors “include, but are not limited to: 1. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78867 - 2014-09-15