Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31611 - 31620 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31611 - 31620 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
M&I Bank South Central v. Neil C. Lofberg
its motion for summary judgment, denying its motion for judgment against Neil C. Lofberg (Neil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12752 - 2005-03-31
its motion for summary judgment, denying its motion for judgment against Neil C. Lofberg (Neil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12752 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Union’s (“ECU”) motion to compel arbitration. Because the circuit court’s order directly conflicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039321 - 2025-11-18
Union’s (“ECU”) motion to compel arbitration. Because the circuit court’s order directly conflicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039321 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
meaningless” and rendering his confession involuntary. The circuit court held a hearing on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137797 - 2017-09-21
meaningless” and rendering his confession involuntary. The circuit court held a hearing on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137797 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime. ¶15 In July 2015, Mcalister filed a postconviction motion alleging that he had newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218491 - 2018-09-05
to a crime. ¶15 In July 2015, Mcalister filed a postconviction motion alleging that he had newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218491 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Brian D. Seefeldt
for the termination of the first trial, we determine that the circuit court erred in granting the State's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16530 - 2017-09-21
for the termination of the first trial, we determine that the circuit court erred in granting the State's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16530 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bradley K. Block
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26502 - 2006-09-18
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26502 - 2006-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2011-12).[1] He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion.[2] On appeal, Berrios
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137005 - 2015-03-09
) (2011-12).[1] He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion.[2] On appeal, Berrios
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137005 - 2015-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08)[1] motion. Ross raises seven claims: (1) he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36595 - 2009-05-26
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08)[1] motion. Ross raises seven claims: (1) he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36595 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s case. Jenkins also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214490 - 2018-06-19
that the court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s case. Jenkins also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214490 - 2018-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and orders denying pre-sentencing and postconviction motions for plea withdrawal. Clincy contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137236 - 2015-03-11
and orders denying pre-sentencing and postconviction motions for plea withdrawal. Clincy contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137236 - 2015-03-11