Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31611 - 31620 of 34017 for dismissed.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence had been suppressed, the State would have been “required” “to seek dismissal of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250993 - 2019-12-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
recommended the circuit court dismiss the enhancer and amend the judgment of conviction to a simple stalking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214799 - 2018-06-26

[PDF] Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
, 685 N.W.2d 546, review dismissed, 2004 WI 138, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 689 N.W.2d 55 (Wis. Nov. 22, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6785 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Wesley H.
[their] physical health.” ¶2 Wesley argues that the circuit court erred: (1) in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3955 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Marty R. Caban
), cert. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1043 (1991). In this case, however, the record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7838 - 2017-09-19

Dominic J. Anderson v. Board of Bar Examiners
. The ticket was subsequently dismissed, either because it was lost or because the issuing officer chose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25392 - 2006-06-01

State v. Glenn F. Schwebke
of the State’s case, Schwebke moved for dismissal, arguing that the State’s evidence was insufficient to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16286 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
court apparently dismissed the petition.[4] Due to social worker turnover, the band mistakenly believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16189 - 2005-03-31

Al Curtis v. Jon E. Litscher
. See Wis. Stat. §§ 301.21(2m)(b)[3] and 302.02(3t) (1999-2000).[4] Those filings were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4146 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on an alleged violation of the witness sequestration order; (3) the trial court erred in failing to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34975 - 2009-01-19