Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31621 - 31630 of 82212 for judgment for m s.
Search results 31621 - 31630 of 82212 for judgment for m s.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180949 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180949 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94137 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94137 - 2014-09-15
Koepsell's Olde Popcorn Wagons, Inc. v. Koepsell's Festival Popcorn Wagons, Ltd.
], 2002 Order, [Kocovsky] own[s] the trademark.” ¶27 In reply to Kocovsky’s motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6302 - 2005-03-31
], 2002 Order, [Kocovsky] own[s] the trademark.” ¶27 In reply to Kocovsky’s motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6302 - 2005-03-31
Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
-petitioners the cause was argued by James M. Voss, assistant city attorney, with whom on the briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17039 - 2005-03-31
-petitioners the cause was argued by James M. Voss, assistant city attorney, with whom on the briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17039 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
-respondents-petitioners the cause was argued by James M. Voss, assistant city attorney, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17039 - 2017-09-21
-respondents-petitioners the cause was argued by James M. Voss, assistant city attorney, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 62
-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Michael G. Levine, and Matthew S. Pinix of Law Offices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171519 - 2017-09-21
-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Michael G. Levine, and Matthew S. Pinix of Law Offices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28756 - 2014-09-15
. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28756 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of Milwaukee, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28756 - 2007-04-23
of Milwaukee, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28756 - 2007-04-23
Exxonmobil Oil Corporation v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of La Crosse
on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The court denied Exxon’s motion and granted the Authority’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19005 - 2005-07-13
on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The court denied Exxon’s motion and granted the Authority’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19005 - 2005-07-13