Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31631 - 31640 of 39158 for c's.
Search results 31631 - 31640 of 39158 for c's.
COURT OF APPEALS
First, Wis. Stat. § 971.31(5)(c) provides: “In felony actions, objections based on the insufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135542 - 2015-02-23
First, Wis. Stat. § 971.31(5)(c) provides: “In felony actions, objections based on the insufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135542 - 2015-02-23
2008 WI APP 9
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Michael C. Demo of Wagner, Falconer & Judd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31236 - 2008-01-29
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Michael C. Demo of Wagner, Falconer & Judd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31236 - 2008-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
explained that “cities have no inherent power to tax,” and that “[c]ities may only enact the types
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70930 - 2014-09-15
explained that “cities have no inherent power to tax,” and that “[c]ities may only enact the types
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70930 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(2), (3) (c) and (4), 287.07, 287.08, 287.81 and 299.64 (2), subch. VI of ch. 77, this chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93964 - 2013-03-11
(2), (3) (c) and (4), 287.07, 287.08, 287.81 and 299.64 (2), subch. VI of ch. 77, this chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93964 - 2013-03-11
2009 WI APP 181
not meet the definiteness requirement of the statute of frauds, Wis. Stat. § 706.02(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43921 - 2011-02-07
not meet the definiteness requirement of the statute of frauds, Wis. Stat. § 706.02(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43921 - 2011-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
in imposing the sentence. ¶13 Issue C. The sentencing court mistakenly believed that he had broken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50110 - 2010-05-18
in imposing the sentence. ¶13 Issue C. The sentencing court mistakenly believed that he had broken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50110 - 2010-05-18
State v. Samuel V. Perez
of the order and the State appeals.[2] We reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 3, 2002, Naomi C., age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6074 - 2005-03-31
of the order and the State appeals.[2] We reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 3, 2002, Naomi C., age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6074 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Phillips
. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4727 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4727 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction relief that requests public defender representation. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30(2)(c) & (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56505 - 2010-11-08
postconviction relief that requests public defender representation. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30(2)(c) & (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56505 - 2010-11-08
State v. Everton Taylor
ruling”). C. Sufficiency of Evidence to Support Conviction ¶13 Taylor argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
ruling”). C. Sufficiency of Evidence to Support Conviction ¶13 Taylor argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31