Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31631 - 31640 of 82833 for case search.
Search results 31631 - 31640 of 82833 for case search.
[PDF]
Childeric Maxy v. Julia Meyer
and if she still had to attend the hearing or would the case be dropped. The small claims clerk responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3506 - 2017-09-19
and if she still had to attend the hearing or would the case be dropped. The small claims clerk responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3506 - 2017-09-19
William E. Currier v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. BACKGROUND This case arises out of Currier's failure to file Wisconsin income tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9089 - 2005-03-31
. BACKGROUND This case arises out of Currier's failure to file Wisconsin income tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
. § 971.31(10) for criminal cases does not apply in civil forfeiture actions, such as the one before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4305 - 2017-09-19
. § 971.31(10) for criminal cases does not apply in civil forfeiture actions, such as the one before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4305 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Klaeser
of the chemical test results. He rests his argument on a line of cases which hold that a defendant’s driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21
of the chemical test results. He rests his argument on a line of cases which hold that a defendant’s driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248032 - 2019-10-02
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248032 - 2019-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cory C. Reed-Daniels
this is a completely supportable, provable case. The State was generous with Mr. Reed-Daniels. I could have issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24692 - 2006-04-03
this is a completely supportable, provable case. The State was generous with Mr. Reed-Daniels. I could have issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24692 - 2006-04-03
[PDF]
2023AP002362 - 2024-07-02 Court Order
, FILED 07-02-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP002362 2024-07-02 Court Order Filed 07
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=822562 - 2024-10-02
, FILED 07-02-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP002362 2024-07-02 Court Order Filed 07
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=822562 - 2024-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
-invigorated McCleary standards to future cases, those decided after April 15, 2004, the date on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
-invigorated McCleary standards to future cases, those decided after April 15, 2004, the date on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
to limit the application of the re-invigorated McCleary standards to future cases, those decided after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
to limit the application of the re-invigorated McCleary standards to future cases, those decided after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17