Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31631 - 31640 of 36304 for e's.
Search results 31631 - 31640 of 36304 for e's.
State v. Lindsey A.F.
E. Doyle, attorney general, and oral argument by Sally L. Wellman, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16462 - 2005-03-31
E. Doyle, attorney general, and oral argument by Sally L. Wellman, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16462 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Coleman
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Gregory M. Weber, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4307 - 2017-09-19
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Gregory M. Weber, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4307 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Coleman
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Gregory M. Weber, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4308 - 2017-09-19
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Gregory M. Weber, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4308 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James P. Henderson
made no difference. The privilege of self defense turns on a defendant’s “reasonabl[e] belie[f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2249 - 2017-09-19
made no difference. The privilege of self defense turns on a defendant’s “reasonabl[e] belie[f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion based on the record before it. ¶19 As a general matter, “[w]e give deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147243 - 2017-09-21
exercised its discretion based on the record before it. ¶19 As a general matter, “[w]e give deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147243 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Tamara G. Hernandez v. Randolph S. Allen
of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 25
, ¶41, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341 (“[W]e conclude that the words of WIS. STAT. § 973.015, as well
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974581 - 2025-06-24
, ¶41, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341 (“[W]e conclude that the words of WIS. STAT. § 973.015, as well
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974581 - 2025-06-24
[PDF]
Robert G. Morris v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
was submitted on the brief of Frank D. Remington, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4901 - 2017-09-19
was submitted on the brief of Frank D. Remington, assistant attorney general, and James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4901 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
balancing test established in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). Therefore, “[w]e consider (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680086 - 2023-07-19
balancing test established in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). Therefore, “[w]e consider (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680086 - 2023-07-19
State v. Jason Phillips
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Paul Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9853 - 2005-03-31
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Paul Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9853 - 2005-03-31