Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31631 - 31640 of 50548 for our.
Search results 31631 - 31640 of 50548 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement was shown to the jury. A claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel lacks merit. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262493 - 2020-06-02
statement was shown to the jury. A claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel lacks merit. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262493 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its discretion in considering and weighing the sentencing factors. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184281 - 2017-09-21
erroneously exercised its discretion in considering and weighing the sentencing factors. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184281 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.2d 197, there would be no arguable merit to an appellate challenge to the sentence. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159241 - 2017-09-21
.2d 197, there would be no arguable merit to an appellate challenge to the sentence. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Law. Beck is correct. In State v. Zielke, 137 Wis. 2d 39, 51, 403 N.W.2d 427 (1987), our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157729 - 2017-09-21
Law. Beck is correct. In State v. Zielke, 137 Wis. 2d 39, 51, 403 N.W.2d 427 (1987), our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157729 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
as responses to the no-merit report. At our request, Attorney Backes filed supplemental reports as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96649 - 2014-09-15
as responses to the no-merit report. At our request, Attorney Backes filed supplemental reports as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96649 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his sentence due to new factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122818 - 2014-10-01
his sentence due to new factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122818 - 2014-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). ¶10 Our case law establishes the following four elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). ¶10 Our case law establishes the following four elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not wish to challenge the validity of the plea. Our review of the circuit court’s denial of a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98495 - 2014-09-15
not wish to challenge the validity of the plea. Our review of the circuit court’s denial of a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98495 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
challenge to the sentence. Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable basis for reversing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144593 - 2015-07-13
challenge to the sentence. Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable basis for reversing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144593 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
Carrie M. Fitzgerald v. Peter P. Karoblis
, 2001. Fitzgerald fails to develop this argument. In any event, our review of this record leads us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7281 - 2017-09-20
, 2001. Fitzgerald fails to develop this argument. In any event, our review of this record leads us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7281 - 2017-09-20