Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31641 - 31650 of 82833 for case search.
Search results 31641 - 31650 of 82833 for case search.
[PDF]
Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
. § 971.31(10) for criminal cases does not apply in civil forfeiture actions, such as the one before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4305 - 2017-09-19
. § 971.31(10) for criminal cases does not apply in civil forfeiture actions, such as the one before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4305 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Klaeser
of the chemical test results. He rests his argument on a line of cases which hold that a defendant’s driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21
of the chemical test results. He rests his argument on a line of cases which hold that a defendant’s driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248032 - 2019-10-02
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248032 - 2019-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cory C. Reed-Daniels
this is a completely supportable, provable case. The State was generous with Mr. Reed-Daniels. I could have issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24692 - 2006-04-03
this is a completely supportable, provable case. The State was generous with Mr. Reed-Daniels. I could have issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24692 - 2006-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Erik W. Parlow
. The trial court concluded that there was not enough evidence to sustain a prima facie case that Parlow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14387 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court concluded that there was not enough evidence to sustain a prima facie case that Parlow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14387 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117164 - 2014-07-13
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117164 - 2014-07-13
Doris M. Hoopingarner v. Town of Lakewood
of the case. See MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. State, 203 Wis. 2d 392, 400, 553 N.W.2d 284 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16279 - 2013-06-03
of the case. See MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. State, 203 Wis. 2d 392, 400, 553 N.W.2d 284 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16279 - 2013-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
. In this case, after the vehicle Morton was driving was stopped, Morton was placed under arrest and transported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110417 - 2014-04-16
. In this case, after the vehicle Morton was driving was stopped, Morton was placed under arrest and transported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110417 - 2014-04-16
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
to limit the application of the re-invigorated McCleary standards to future cases, those decided after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
to limit the application of the re-invigorated McCleary standards to future cases, those decided after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17