Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31651 - 31660 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 31651 - 31660 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104314 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104314 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Alan C. Campbell
record from Ohio, which showed that the Ohio conviction was based upon Campbell’s forgery of a $350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3749 - 2017-09-19
record from Ohio, which showed that the Ohio conviction was based upon Campbell’s forgery of a $350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3749 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael J. Dyer
from the record that the trial court also found the State proved that exigent circumstances existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19139 - 2005-08-01
from the record that the trial court also found the State proved that exigent circumstances existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19139 - 2005-08-01
Steven J. Bohr v. Connie R. Bohr
or reasonable inferences from the record to which proper legal standards were applied. See id. at 290, 493 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10792 - 2005-03-31
or reasonable inferences from the record to which proper legal standards were applied. See id. at 290, 493 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Kyle W.F.
3 There is no evidence in the record establishing this. However, in Kyle’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16111 - 2017-09-21
3 There is no evidence in the record establishing this. However, in Kyle’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing “some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43710 - 2014-09-15
on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing “some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43710 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Stacy L. Blunt
of the record that [Blunt] knew of his right.” Id. Although our review of the record indicates that Blunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11680 - 2017-09-19
of the record that [Blunt] knew of his right.” Id. Although our review of the record indicates that Blunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11680 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts in the record and the court relied on appropriate and applicable law. Id. ¶7 “[A]lthough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189455 - 2017-09-21
the facts in the record and the court relied on appropriate and applicable law. Id. ¶7 “[A]lthough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189455 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266601 - 2020-07-08
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266601 - 2020-07-08