Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31661 - 31670 of 97620 for court records search online.
Search results 31661 - 31670 of 97620 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Bernard W. Harris
not included in the record. He also notes that one of the briefs submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2757 - 2017-09-19
not included in the record. He also notes that one of the briefs submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2757 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven C.
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5049 - 2017-09-19
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5049 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven C.
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven C.
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5051 - 2017-09-19
and that the court therefore erred by releasing his records. However, the DOC was not required to seek court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5051 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Matters which were not presented to the circuit court and made part of the record before that court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275825 - 2020-08-12
. Matters which were not presented to the circuit court and made part of the record before that court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275825 - 2020-08-12
[PDF]
William J. Schimmels v. John A. Noordover
supreme court confirmed the impact of a recorded plat on the rights of lot owners when it explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20710 - 2017-09-21
supreme court confirmed the impact of a recorded plat on the rights of lot owners when it explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20710 - 2017-09-21
William J. Schimmels v. John A. Noordover
, as of June 16, 2004, the court’s conclusions were, in relevant part: 4. The recorded Plat and recorded deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20710 - 2006-01-24
, as of June 16, 2004, the court’s conclusions were, in relevant part: 4. The recorded Plat and recorded deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20710 - 2006-01-24
Gary Theige v. County of Vernon
followed instead. Accordingly, we conclude, as did the trial court initially, that the tax deed recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12305 - 2005-03-31
followed instead. Accordingly, we conclude, as did the trial court initially, that the tax deed recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gary Theige v. County of Vernon
as the trial court initially concluded; (2) the deed cannot therefore be reformed by the subsequent recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12305 - 2017-09-21
as the trial court initially concluded; (2) the deed cannot therefore be reformed by the subsequent recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12305 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2011 A. John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60974 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2011 A. John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60974 - 2014-09-15