Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31661 - 31670 of 37335 for f h.

[PDF] State v. Travis Allen
, ¶18; see also Hardaway v. Young, 302 F.3d 757 (7th Cir. 2002). No. 2004AP2278-CR 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
), in 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) and (3) (2007-08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50406 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
will reinstate his direct appeal rights, and he can pursue an appeal on those claims: [I]f a defendant files
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
any more valid or persuasive. See McAfee v. Thurmer, 589 F.3d 353, 357 (7th Cir. 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57625 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Nicole O.
) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from the child. (f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7674 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Nicole O.
) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from the child. (f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7673 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief.” State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶14, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. “[I]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967734 - 2025-06-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had a ministerial duty to investigate further, stating “[i]f we turn this into a ministerial duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123269 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 42
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Edward F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28012 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145097 - 2015-07-27