Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31661 - 31670 of 64076 for records/1000.
Search results 31661 - 31670 of 64076 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court’s discretionary decisions, we may independently search the record to uphold its ruling.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27493 - 2006-12-18
court’s discretionary decisions, we may independently search the record to uphold its ruling.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27493 - 2006-12-18
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
be directed toward developing a record that is as complete as possible in order to facilitate subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
be directed toward developing a record that is as complete as possible in order to facilitate subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Gilmore
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
Gregory W. Schaefer v. Barbara Conway
, there is no evidence in the record that any of the other factors created a fiduciary relationship.[4] The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25
, there is no evidence in the record that any of the other factors created a fiduciary relationship.[4] The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25
State v. Paul E. Kimmes
would be stayed pending the outcome of this appeal. After the record was filed with this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13129 - 2005-03-31
would be stayed pending the outcome of this appeal. After the record was filed with this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subjective intent, that finding is supported by the record; (2) if the issue presents a legal question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126124 - 2017-09-21
subjective intent, that finding is supported by the record; (2) if the issue presents a legal question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126124 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s discretionary decisions, and we search the record for reasons to sustain the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96371 - 2014-09-15
court’s discretionary decisions, and we search the record for reasons to sustain the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96371 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605223 - 2022-12-28
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605223 - 2022-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103520 - 2017-09-21
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23