Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31661 - 31670 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Marjorie (Grimes) Mount v. Dennis Grimes
month to pay the arrearages, plus interest on the arrearages. Grimes contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8795 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and further asserted manifest injustice, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and failure to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840210 - 2024-08-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
Specifically, Shata argues that, under Padilla, his trial counsel performed deficiently by failing to inform
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144258 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010). ¶3 Specifically, Shata argues that, under Padilla, his trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144258 - 2015-07-08

State v. Nancy R. Lamon
selection for Lamon's trial began. Twenty out of 35 possible jurors were called and seated in the jury box
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16456 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wells Andrew McGiffert v. Frank Carl Rozowski, Jr.
intent preclude summary judgment. They also argue that the trial court erroneously relieved GRE of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2398 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) and 346.65(2) (2005‑06).[3] He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16

[PDF] State v. Brian A. Schultz
jumping. He was convicted after a jury trial. 1 ¶3 On appeal, Schultz argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3329 - 2017-09-19

John C. Hagen v. City of Milwaukee Employee's Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment and dismissing his claims against the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4639 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Caryl Sprague v. City of Madison
that the trial court correctly found that § 3.23, MGO, unambiguously applied to housemates at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8261 - 2017-09-19