Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31671 - 31680 of 69145 for he.
Search results 31671 - 31680 of 69145 for he.
[PDF]
Jeffrey E. Sobczak v. Eleanor Ciganek
(and costs) he sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The issues are: (1) whether Sobczak was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3371 - 2017-09-19
(and costs) he sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The issues are: (1) whether Sobczak was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3371 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a written statement from Hodges indicating he does not wish to withdraw his plea based on the court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174780 - 2017-09-21
a written statement from Hodges indicating he does not wish to withdraw his plea based on the court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174780 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
’ extended supervision, consecutive to another sentence he was serving at the time. The record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112568 - 2014-05-19
’ extended supervision, consecutive to another sentence he was serving at the time. The record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112568 - 2014-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP2397 2 Appellant petitioned to change his name, which he alleged was DEAN RICHARD
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251689 - 2019-12-26
. No. 2018AP2397 2 Appellant petitioned to change his name, which he alleged was DEAN RICHARD
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251689 - 2019-12-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order affirming a parole revocation. He contends that he was no longer under the jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15
an order affirming a parole revocation. He contends that he was no longer under the jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jorel T. Norwood
by a prisoner as a repeat offender. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07
by a prisoner as a repeat offender. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07
Frontsheet
stipulated that he does not claim any of the exceptions articulated in SCR 22.22(3). Attorney Swensen
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33606 - 2005-07-30
stipulated that he does not claim any of the exceptions articulated in SCR 22.22(3). Attorney Swensen
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33606 - 2005-07-30
State v. Stacey R. Piper
an affirmative defense: “[T]he defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25277 - 2010-05-25
an affirmative defense: “[T]he defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25277 - 2010-05-25
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, he argued that postconviction counsel had been ineffective “for failing to file a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32208 - 2005-03-31
motion, he argued that postconviction counsel had been ineffective “for failing to file a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32208 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and with intent to steal or commit a felony in such place.” At trial, Daniels did not dispute that he entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107629 - 2014-01-29
and with intent to steal or commit a felony in such place.” At trial, Daniels did not dispute that he entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107629 - 2014-01-29