Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31671 - 31680 of 70363 for his.
Search results 31671 - 31680 of 70363 for his.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, No. 2018AP1865-CRNM 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.43(4) (2013-14),1 and from the denial of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252130 - 2020-01-03
, No. 2018AP1865-CRNM 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.43(4) (2013-14),1 and from the denial of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252130 - 2020-01-03
County of Racine v. Ronald C.
a link between his mental illness and his dangerousness. In addition, Ronald argues that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3770 - 2005-03-31
a link between his mental illness and his dangerousness. In addition, Ronald argues that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3770 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wilfredo Melo
of conviction, following his guilty plea, for possession with intent to deliver cocaine. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
of conviction, following his guilty plea, for possession with intent to deliver cocaine. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Karen A. Lloyd v. Daniel J. Lloyd
, JJ. PER CURIAM. Daniel Lloyd appeals from an order denying his request to modify the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14627 - 2017-09-21
, JJ. PER CURIAM. Daniel Lloyd appeals from an order denying his request to modify the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bradley Zylka
and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm. ¶2 Zylka was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16043 - 2017-09-21
and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm. ¶2 Zylka was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16043 - 2017-09-21
State v. James E. Gray
occasion in 1990 when he falsely claimed that he was getting the prescription filled for a friend of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14818 - 2005-03-31
occasion in 1990 when he falsely claimed that he was getting the prescription filled for a friend of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14818 - 2005-03-31
State v. Malcolm B. Rush
, and was placed on probation and ordered to pay restitution. On April 8, 2002, while on lunch recess from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6711 - 2005-03-31
, and was placed on probation and ordered to pay restitution. On April 8, 2002, while on lunch recess from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6711 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley Zylka
sexual assault of the same child[1] and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16043 - 2005-03-31
sexual assault of the same child[1] and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16043 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(2)(a) (2009-10),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69297 - 2011-08-08
(2)(a) (2009-10),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69297 - 2011-08-08
James P. Watkins v. William G. Eastman
dismissing his claim against the Estate of William G. Eastman. The claim is based on Eastman's shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7979 - 2005-03-31
dismissing his claim against the Estate of William G. Eastman. The claim is based on Eastman's shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7979 - 2005-03-31