Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31671 - 31680 of 57358 for id.
Search results 31671 - 31680 of 57358 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is a new factor justifying a motion to modify a sentence. Id. A “new factor” is a fact highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286368 - 2020-09-10
that there is a new factor justifying a motion to modify a sentence. Id. A “new factor” is a fact highly relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286368 - 2020-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the proper standard of law and reach a conclusion a reasonable judge could reach.” Id. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391959 - 2021-07-20
the proper standard of law and reach a conclusion a reasonable judge could reach.” Id. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391959 - 2021-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute, which also presents a question of law. Id. ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 32.10 is based on Article
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63631 - 2011-06-08
of a statute, which also presents a question of law. Id. ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 32.10 is based on Article
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63631 - 2011-06-08
Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. v. James P. Brennan
and may be waived. Id. at 40, 148 N.W.2d at 695. Here, the objection is not to a defect as to the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7851 - 2005-03-31
and may be waived. Id. at 40, 148 N.W.2d at 695. Here, the objection is not to a defect as to the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence, we must adopt the inference that supports the verdict.” Id. ¶3 A defendant is guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141238 - 2017-09-21
the evidence, we must adopt the inference that supports the verdict.” Id. ¶3 A defendant is guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141238 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
court with instructions to submit to a jury the question of whether a material breach occurred. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59543 - 2014-09-15
court with instructions to submit to a jury the question of whether a material breach occurred. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59543 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry George
and facts relevant to plausible options are virtually unchallengeable. Id. at 690. To establish prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6128 - 2005-03-31
and facts relevant to plausible options are virtually unchallengeable. Id. at 690. To establish prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6128 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the law.” Id. It is within our discretion to grant a new trial in the interest of justice if our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17
of the law.” Id. It is within our discretion to grant a new trial in the interest of justice if our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17
[PDF]
State v. James J. Kempinski
that there is a “fair and just reason” for plea withdrawal. Id. at 861-62. Plea withdrawal should be freely allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2416 - 2017-09-19
that there is a “fair and just reason” for plea withdrawal. Id. at 861-62. Plea withdrawal should be freely allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2416 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tony Blackwell
court reiterated the de novo standard of reviewing the denial of a lesser-included instruction, see id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11878 - 2017-09-21
court reiterated the de novo standard of reviewing the denial of a lesser-included instruction, see id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11878 - 2017-09-21