Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31681 - 31690 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
When counsel for the defendant filed a motion seeking to prohibit the plaintiff from presenting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17123 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1938-CR 2 After the jury convicted him, Wells filed a postconviction motion seeking a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500457 - 2022-03-30

State v. Alexander Dejesus
after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence discovered in a search of his pockets. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Dunn v. Ronald J. Kistner
, as well as an order denying a motion to suppress the results of a blood test. Kistner argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7287 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. Welch filed a postconviction motion for resentencing on grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251804 - 2020-01-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
arrested for operating while intoxicated. Seidl filed a suppression motion, arguing Haag did not have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762492 - 2024-02-14

William Frederick Williams v. Rita Llanas (Williams)
, after Rita missed the court date due to illness. Rita subsequently filed a motion to reopen, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13856 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard L. Bignell
that the test results are admissible and therefore affirms the order denying Bignell’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2407 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Spencer Parks appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367735 - 2021-05-20

State v. Lance L. Reed
an order denying his motion to suppress blood test evidence. Reed argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5184 - 2005-03-31