Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31681 - 31690 of 69135 for as he.

CA Blank Order
, Heckert renews his argument that he is entitled to sentence modification on the basis of a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133147 - 2015-01-20

State v. Barry L. Schouten
, 2002. He observed Schouten and Luke Peachey walking on a moderately lit stretch of Main Street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5966 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
him of aggravated battery, resisting an officer, and obstructing an officer. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183698 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction entered on a jury’s verdict, on one count of first-degree intentional homicide. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63154 - 2014-07-28

COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault as a habitual criminal, and other convictions where he committed acts of sexual violence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31481 - 2008-01-14

Roy U. Schenk v. Michael Clark
in the deeds therefore would give Schenk approximately 8 acres of land rather than the 5 acres he intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2798 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
modified while he was incarcerated for convictions of multiple drug offenses. At the time, Ratliff
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218786 - 2018-09-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 738, 744 (1967). Marks was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not responded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103463 - 2017-09-21

State v. Scott D. Nash
was prejudiced by counsel’s negligence. We conclude that he was not, and therefore affirm. Nash violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14652 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of a firearm by a felon. He argues that the circuit court should have suppressed evidence found in his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56446 - 2010-11-29