Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31681 - 31690 of 46138 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
prong of the Strickland test, it need not consider the other one. Id. at 697. Whether an attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33270 - 2008-07-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on cause, had they been instructed on the substantial factor test in Wisconsin, and had they not been led
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94235 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
in question. The test is whether reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46411 - 2010-02-01

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Sowle
] breath” and conducted field sobriety tests. During the stop, the officer also noticed “two small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14141 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
independent contractors. Wis. Stat. § 111.32(5). Courts must apply the “economic realities” test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118079 - 2014-07-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
magazine under the driver’s seat; two plastic bags, containing a substance that field-tested positive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959095 - 2025-05-20

State v. Scott E. Brandstetter
that Richter is poorly reasoned. It applies the same test as Anderson to a different set of facts. Those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6293 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. “[T]he test is not whether the method of service was reasonable or whether the agency was prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30428 - 2007-10-02

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
by applying a “common-sense test” – “[w]hat would a reasonable police officer reasonably suspect in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27589 - 2006-12-26

The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
proceedings. ¶7 A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim tests whether the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4405 - 2005-03-31