Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31691 - 31700 of 97782 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31691 - 31700 of 97782 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 11, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31117 - 2007-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 11, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31117 - 2007-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
records case is within the circuit court’s discretion. See George v. Record Custodian, 169 Wis. 2d 573
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59343 - 2011-01-26
records case is within the circuit court’s discretion. See George v. Record Custodian, 169 Wis. 2d 573
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59343 - 2011-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
was arrested and charged with both counts. He pled not guilty and the case was tried to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33104 - 2008-06-23
was arrested and charged with both counts. He pled not guilty and the case was tried to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33104 - 2008-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 28, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125387 - 2014-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 28, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125387 - 2014-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
a previous supreme court case.”). Nonetheless, he claims that “such drastic action is not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105313 - 2013-12-09
a previous supreme court case.”). Nonetheless, he claims that “such drastic action is not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105313 - 2013-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32088 - 2008-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32088 - 2008-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 11, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145968 - 2015-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 11, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145968 - 2015-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 28, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46368 - 2010-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 28, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46368 - 2010-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
The present case does not involve a situation where the court granted a divorce judgment or otherwise sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33178 - 2005-06-25
The present case does not involve a situation where the court granted a divorce judgment or otherwise sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33178 - 2005-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim. The trial court denied Kamlager’s motion to suppress. The case went to a five-day jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30311 - 2007-09-18
the victim. The trial court denied Kamlager’s motion to suppress. The case went to a five-day jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30311 - 2007-09-18