Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 50845 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 50845 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.
State v. Daniel C. Krause
that the arresting officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Krause because another officer observed Krause driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14532 - 2005-03-31
that the arresting officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Krause because another officer observed Krause driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
State v. Steven Schelk
denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13486 - 2005-03-31
denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13486 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven Schelk
denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31
denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) case. The arresting officer received information from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109824 - 2017-09-21
operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) case. The arresting officer received information from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109824 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gregory A. Zimdars
. ยง 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] Zimdars argues that a police officer violated his Fourth Amendment rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6641 - 2005-03-31
. ยง 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] Zimdars argues that a police officer violated his Fourth Amendment rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Schmidtendorff
alcohol concentration. We hold that the stopping officer's need to respond to another call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11098 - 2017-09-19
alcohol concentration. We hold that the stopping officer's need to respond to another call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11098 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Morrison
- On the evening of October 6, 1993, Morrison was under police surveillance. South Milwaukee Police Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8166 - 2017-09-19
- On the evening of October 6, 1993, Morrison was under police surveillance. South Milwaukee Police Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8166 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in this operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) case. The arresting officer received information from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109824 - 2014-04-02
in this operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) case. The arresting officer received information from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109824 - 2014-04-02