Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 6391 for dr.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 6391 for dr.
COURT OF APPEALS
, striking his hands. Dr. Lee Faucher, Williams’ treating physician, described Williams’ injuries as a life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58829 - 2011-01-12
, striking his hands. Dr. Lee Faucher, Williams’ treating physician, described Williams’ injuries as a life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58829 - 2011-01-12
CA Blank Order
petition was a report authored by Dr. Sheila Fields, who opined that Adams was “not more likely than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
petition was a report authored by Dr. Sheila Fields, who opined that Adams was “not more likely than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was “drunk,” was driving a green Mazda Miata convertible, had “just dr[iven] all over” the Cedar Springs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
was “drunk,” was driving a green Mazda Miata convertible, had “just dr[iven] all over” the Cedar Springs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
State v. Cannon Cornell Mack
to examine Mack: Dr. John Pankiewicz, on Mack’s behalf, and Dr. Kenneth H. Smail, on the State’s behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6763 - 2005-03-31
to examine Mack: Dr. John Pankiewicz, on Mack’s behalf, and Dr. Kenneth H. Smail, on the State’s behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6763 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruven G. Seibert
for purposes of his supervised release petition. Seibert was ultimately examined by Dr. Stephen Dal Cerro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4699 - 2005-03-31
for purposes of his supervised release petition. Seibert was ultimately examined by Dr. Stephen Dal Cerro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4699 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Nancy Lamoreux v. Stephen L. Oreck
, V. DR. STEPHEN L. ORECK, UW HEALTH/PHYSICIANS PLUS MEDICAL GROUP S.C. P/K/A PHYSICIANS PLUS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25284 - 2017-09-21
, V. DR. STEPHEN L. ORECK, UW HEALTH/PHYSICIANS PLUS MEDICAL GROUP S.C. P/K/A PHYSICIANS PLUS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas V. Rankin, M.D. v. Medical Examining Board
¶4 Following a hearing before an administrative law judge, the ALJ found: “Dr. Rankin’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4850 - 2017-09-19
¶4 Following a hearing before an administrative law judge, the ALJ found: “Dr. Rankin’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4850 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
excerpts from her chiropractor, Dr. Alan Weber, and her family doctor, Dr. David Olsrud, in lieu of live
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34867 - 2008-12-10
excerpts from her chiropractor, Dr. Alan Weber, and her family doctor, Dr. David Olsrud, in lieu of live
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34867 - 2008-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
only when clearly erroneous. Id., ¶45. The evaluating psychologist, Dr. Harlan Heinz, submitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218917 - 2018-09-11
only when clearly erroneous. Id., ¶45. The evaluating psychologist, Dr. Harlan Heinz, submitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218917 - 2018-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and warranted a new trial—came from the State’s expert witnesses, Dr. Janet Hill and Dr. Richard Ellwood. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
and warranted a new trial—came from the State’s expert witnesses, Dr. Janet Hill and Dr. Richard Ellwood. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17