Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 63529 for records/1000.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 63529 for records/1000.
Larry George v. Lin Mechler
from two orders dismissing his petitions for writs of mandamus in two public records cases.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7812 - 2005-03-31
from two orders dismissing his petitions for writs of mandamus in two public records cases.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7812 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas W. Reimann v. Dale Poliak
§ 19.37(2), STATS., for Poliak's alleged violation of the open records law. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8362 - 2017-09-19
§ 19.37(2), STATS., for Poliak's alleged violation of the open records law. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8362 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment record as it currently exists and the arguments of the parties raised to date. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143848 - 2015-07-01
judgment record as it currently exists and the arguments of the parties raised to date. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143848 - 2015-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of material fact precludes summary judgment based on the summary judgment record as it currently exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143848 - 2017-09-21
of material fact precludes summary judgment based on the summary judgment record as it currently exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143848 - 2017-09-21
Kenneth S. Wyderka v. Luis Garcia
the respondents’ motion for summary judgment because it did not correctly interpret a recording statute, Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15407 - 2005-03-31
the respondents’ motion for summary judgment because it did not correctly interpret a recording statute, Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15407 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael S. Elkins v. Grace Brown
dismissing his mandamus action under the open records law. We affirm. No. 2005AP468 2 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24563 - 2017-09-21
dismissing his mandamus action under the open records law. We affirm. No. 2005AP468 2 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24563 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
showing to justify the circuit court’s in camera inspection of the victim’s counseling records. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
showing to justify the circuit court’s in camera inspection of the victim’s counseling records. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
recording of the police dispatch call that alerted the officer to the possibility that McCabe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28953 - 2014-09-15
recording of the police dispatch call that alerted the officer to the possibility that McCabe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28953 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, counsel’s report, and Oliver’s responses, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
the record, counsel’s report, and Oliver’s responses, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, counsel’s report, and Oliver’s responses, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
the record, counsel’s report, and Oliver’s responses, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17