Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 58245 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial of three counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child and an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98322 - 2013-06-25
a jury trial of three counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child and an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98322 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Michael Hirn
) and 939.05, STATS. Hirn presents four arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13342 - 2017-09-21
) and 939.05, STATS. Hirn presents four arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13342 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion in failing to: (1) consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41524 - 2014-09-15
are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion in failing to: (1) consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41524 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of postconviction and trial counsel based on trial counsel’s failure to (1) object to the submission of a lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90616 - 2012-12-18
of postconviction and trial counsel based on trial counsel’s failure to (1) object to the submission of a lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90616 - 2012-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion in failing to: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41524 - 2009-09-28
. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion in failing to: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41524 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
State v. Jacqueline Farence
judgments of conviction and an order denying her motion for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5150 - 2017-09-19
judgments of conviction and an order denying her motion for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5150 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
requested a jury trial. Subsequently, in Jennifer D.’s presence in open court, her counsel informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29268 - 2014-09-15
requested a jury trial. Subsequently, in Jennifer D.’s presence in open court, her counsel informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29268 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and by her guardian ad litem. Initially, pursuant to statute, Jennifer D.’s counsel requested a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29268 - 2007-06-04
and by her guardian ad litem. Initially, pursuant to statute, Jennifer D.’s counsel requested a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29268 - 2007-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for not subpoenaing a certain witness for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82078 - 2012-05-08
argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for not subpoenaing a certain witness for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82078 - 2012-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Terrance A. Garner
newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial; (2) he was denied the opportunity to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3775 - 2017-09-19
newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial; (2) he was denied the opportunity to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3775 - 2017-09-19