Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 21731 for warrants.
Search results 3171 - 3180 of 21731 for warrants.
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we independently review whether those facts warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124263 - 2014-10-15
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we independently review whether those facts warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124263 - 2014-10-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to resentencing. Payne alternatively contends that new factors warrant sentence modification. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119964 - 2014-09-15
to resentencing. Payne alternatively contends that new factors warrant sentence modification. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119964 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Smaxwell
they be used to show probable cause for issuance of a warrant.” However, the court in Williams did not state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15924 - 2017-09-21
they be used to show probable cause for issuance of a warrant.” However, the court in Williams did not state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15924 - 2017-09-21
State v. Herbert W. McGee
prejudicial to warrant a new trial. Id. The denial of a motion for mistrial will be reversed only upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12222 - 2005-03-31
prejudicial to warrant a new trial. Id. The denial of a motion for mistrial will be reversed only upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12222 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial,” and we will not reverse the court’s decision except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184274 - 2017-09-21
was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial,” and we will not reverse the court’s decision except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184274 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. Johnson claims two new factors exist that warrant the modification of his sentence. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33533 - 2008-07-30
for reconsideration. Johnson claims two new factors exist that warrant the modification of his sentence. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33533 - 2008-07-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that there was an open warrant for Howard. The officer arrested Howard and conducted a search incident to arrest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99748 - 2014-09-15
that there was an open warrant for Howard. The officer arrested Howard and conducted a search incident to arrest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
and that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
the original motion was conclusory and did not set forth a viable claim for relief, which warranted a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30270 - 2014-09-15
the original motion was conclusory and did not set forth a viable claim for relief, which warranted a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30270 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’—to address the traffic violation that warranted the stop.” Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348, 354
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757351 - 2024-01-30
’—to address the traffic violation that warranted the stop.” Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348, 354
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757351 - 2024-01-30