Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31701 - 31710 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31701 - 31710 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Frontsheet
2012 WI 33 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP2851-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80298 - 2012-06-03
2012 WI 33 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP2851-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80298 - 2012-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
for in the will that Laatsch sought to admit to probate. The trial court explained: In this case, other than the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131802 - 2014-12-15
for in the will that Laatsch sought to admit to probate. The trial court explained: In this case, other than the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131802 - 2014-12-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2022 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP192-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541496 - 2022-09-16
2022 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP192-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541496 - 2022-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 26, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53745 - 2010-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 26, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53745 - 2010-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 5, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30150 - 2007-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 5, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30150 - 2007-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
constituted a denial under case precedent. Nonetheless, the court indicated, “Assuming this to be a denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98478 - 2013-07-01
constituted a denial under case precedent. Nonetheless, the court indicated, “Assuming this to be a denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98478 - 2013-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 9, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96628 - 2013-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 9, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96628 - 2013-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31165 - 2007-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31165 - 2007-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
was going through, but that in the court’s relative’s case, she accepted responsibility and was willing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42485 - 2009-10-26
was going through, but that in the court’s relative’s case, she accepted responsibility and was willing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42485 - 2009-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
are relevant to the case.” B.A.C., 135 Wis. 2d at 291. Here, the trial court determined that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53412 - 2010-08-16
are relevant to the case.” B.A.C., 135 Wis. 2d at 291. Here, the trial court determined that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53412 - 2010-08-16