Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31701 - 31710 of 68393 for did.
Search results 31701 - 31710 of 68393 for did.
[PDF]
State v. David W. Mattison
him. Mattison did not testify. In his postconviction motion, he asserted that his counsel refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7758 - 2017-09-19
him. Mattison did not testify. In his postconviction motion, he asserted that his counsel refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7758 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Robert E. Berry
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it instructed the jury, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it instructed the jury, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Cox
2 time OMVWI offender because one of the prior convictions that the court relied on did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7479 - 2017-09-20
2 time OMVWI offender because one of the prior convictions that the court relied on did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7479 - 2017-09-20
State v. Nikolaus Nytsch
that it would present the child’s testimony by videotape, and did, in fact, do so. ¶3 At trial, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4278 - 2005-03-31
that it would present the child’s testimony by videotape, and did, in fact, do so. ¶3 At trial, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4278 - 2005-03-31
Stacy L. Blunt v. Byran Bartow
appellate counsel failed to file a no-merit report even though he did not ask his appellate counsel to close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25051 - 2006-05-08
appellate counsel failed to file a no-merit report even though he did not ask his appellate counsel to close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25051 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[was] holding open per its own order.” Tratz alleged: [T]he 2 page spread sheet that [Monroe] did produce
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131923 - 2017-09-21
[was] holding open per its own order.” Tratz alleged: [T]he 2 page spread sheet that [Monroe] did produce
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131923 - 2017-09-21
In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Anthony M. Johnson, Attorney at Law
it concluded that Mr. Johnson did not meet his burden under 22.28(6)[1] of proving by clear and convincing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16845 - 2005-03-31
it concluded that Mr. Johnson did not meet his burden under 22.28(6)[1] of proving by clear and convincing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16845 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint is that the County did not provide evidence of the details supporting this opinion. The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61328 - 2011-03-16
complaint is that the County did not provide evidence of the details supporting this opinion. The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61328 - 2011-03-16
[PDF]
State v. Scott J. Bogdala
Bogdala. Because we conclude that the court did not err, we affirm. No. 03-0861-CR 2 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6333 - 2017-09-19
Bogdala. Because we conclude that the court did not err, we affirm. No. 03-0861-CR 2 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6333 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record did not disclose any potentially meritorious issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212769 - 2018-05-16
of the record did not disclose any potentially meritorious issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212769 - 2018-05-16